/

/

Choose LLM models and routing based on cost per feature

Choose LLM models and routing based on cost per feature

Choose LLM models and routing based on cost per feature

The agent tracks per-model spend for each AI feature across OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock and Vertex AI, and recommends where a cheaper model or a routing change could fit.

Runs in

Claude · Slack

First optimization recommendation

The next day

ROI

Pays for itself with the first recommendation you act on

For each AI feature, show last month's spend by model and provider, and the cost per 1,000 requests.

› get_context

› get_context

› query ↗ Explorer

› query ↗ Explorer

ticket-summary uses a frontier model for 2.1M requests/month averaging 600 tokens: €6,900. Routing requests under 1,000 tokens to a smaller model would cut that feature's cost by an estimated 70%, if your evals hold.

The AI team runs evals and decides on routing.

Playbook

What the agent does

From what Costory notices to what you decide. Costory suggests the next step in conversation, and you decide whether to go ahead.

Costory notices

A feature's model cost per request rises, or a new model ships.

Costory investigates

01

Allocate by feature

API keys, projects, IAM roles or request labels map LLM spend to features.

02

Break down by model

Per-model cost for each feature, across providers.

03

Add usage

Requests or tokens per feature from your own metrics.

04

Claude proposes

Routing or model changes with the expected cost impact; quality checks stay with your team.

Where you see it

Claude

You decide

The AI team runs evals and decides on routing.

Why it matters

Teams default to the biggest model for everything. Without per-feature, per-model cost, nobody knows where a smaller model would do the job.

Who it’s for

AI engineers, product engineers, CTOs

Where it runs

Claude · Slack

What you get

What lands in front of your team

Per-feature model costs

Know what each feature costs on each model.

Routing candidates

Where a smaller model could fit.

Your evals decide

Cost is one input; quality stays your call.

Sources and assistants

What it connects

The billing data, context and assistants this playbook uses. Each links to its setup page.

The billing data, context and assistants this playbook uses. Each links to its setup page.

Example prompts

Or drive it yourself

The agent runs this on its own once set up. These prompts open in Claude, pre-filled, to set it up, review it or dig into a result.

The agent runs this on its own once set up. These prompts open in Claude, pre-filled, to set it up, review it or dig into a result.

Compare

For each AI feature, show last month's spend by model and provider, and the cost per 1,000 requests.

Recommend

Which features use a frontier model for short, simple requests? Suggest a routing change and estimate the impact.

FAQ

Questions about this playbook

Does Costory evaluate model quality?

No. Costory brings the cost side; model quality and evals stay with your team.

Which LLM providers are supported?

OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI and OpenRouter, plus AI media tools like ElevenLabs and Kling AI.

Does Costory guarantee savings?

No. The agent investigates and recommends with the evidence attached; your team decides what to change. Impact figures are estimates based on your own data.

Does Costory change anything in our cloud accounts?

No. Costory reads billing exports and the metrics you connect, and has no write access to your cloud. Actions it takes create Costory objects only: alerts, reports, dashboards and events. Your team stays in control of every change.

Step-by-step guide in the Costory docs

Put this playbook on call

Included in every plan, from €250/month. 30-day free trial: connect in under 30 minutes, get your first optimization recommendation the next day.

First optimization recommendation

The next day

ROI

Pays for itself with the first recommendation you act on

Setup

About 30 minutes

Data residency

EU

Access

Read-only on your cloud